On 07/09/2011 20:36, Adrian Gonzalez wrote:
> Sorry, no real difference.
>
> Even worse, I'm on my home computer and here I don't see anymore the *5 difference between
simple tags and classic tags.
The figures I saw were:
Test OP Me Cached
tagfile 500 328 203
classic 100 141 156
simple 500 250 156
none 94 140 156
A slight increase in the case where the cache isn't used and a
reasonable improvement in the other cases.
Performance tuning is always going to be system dependent. In this case
I think there us enough evidence to justify putting in the cache - even
if this is effectively a micro benchmark.
> I'll continue these tests tomorrow at work (perhaps there's some file scanning / reading
in action - and since I'm with AV software...).
I'd be very interested to see those results.
> - Tests results -
>
> Downloaded tomcat trunk sources from http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/
That is actually 8.0.x but there is currently very little difference
between that an 7.0.x with is at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/
Cheers,
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
|