Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Subject: Re: Wrong Response returned for a Request
References: <787335296.31863.1311783835503.JavaMail.root@unx-s-manc3>
 <4E304D5B.2010000@apache.org>
 <CAHtT9RtuxwErG+anNhFR1vgBKu227B6tvVzMV+=GVZa1zRstHw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Elliot <rob@lidalia.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAHtT9RtuxwErG+anNhFR1vgBKu227B6tvVzMV+=GVZa1zRstHw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <A9B62238-2F3E-4031-9EDD-B282CFF10669@lidalia.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 07:34:57 +0100 (BST)
To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0


On 28 Jul 2011, at 00:24, David Rees <drees76@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org> wrote:
>> On 27/07/2011 17:23, Robert Elliot wrote:
>>> We are using Tomcat 6.0.29, and occasionally experiencing concurrency i=
ssues
>>> which look very much like the wrong response is being returned for a re=
quest.
>>> While we cannot reproduce it reliably, it seems to happen when Keep-Ali=
ve is turned on.
>>>=20
>>> I noticed this issue with Tomcat 7:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D50957
>>>=20
>>> Is there any chance that issue also exists in 6.0.29?
>>=20
>> None.

Thanks for the confirmation - it seemed unlikely.

>=20
> But perhaps this issue applies:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D50189
>=20
> -Dave
>=20
Thanks very much for the pointer - however, we're using mod_proxy rather th=
an mod_jk so presumably this wouldn't apply?

Rob

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org