Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E5DB64D2 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 17:54:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55576 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2011 17:54:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 55349 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2011 17:54:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 55340 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jul 2011 17:54:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 17:54:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.252.22.151] (HELO smtp6.freeserve.com) (193.252.22.151) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 17:54:43 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3521.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id D9D1E1C00485 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 19:54:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3521.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id CC5131C005F7 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 19:54:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.homeinbox.net (unknown [2.29.25.199]) by mwinf3521.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B11421C00485 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 19:54:19 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20110704175419725.B11421C00485@mwinf3521.me.freeserve.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.homeinbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55694EAA0D4 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 18:54:19 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at homeinbox.net Received: from mail.homeinbox.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.homeinbox.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lGU43VaQoc-K for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 18:54:15 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.23.9] (study03.dev.local [192.168.23.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.homeinbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5CC5AEAA0C2 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 18:54:15 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4E11FE41.2030008@apache.org> Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 18:54:09 +0100 From: Mark Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Multiple errors (regressions) on Tomcat 7.0.17 References: <002701cc3980$5c83a430$158aec90$@preisser@t-online.de> <4E1070E7.9050701@apache.org> <000001cc398b$90f42ae0$b2dc80a0$@preisser@t-online.de> <4E11E2AC.8020008@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4E11E2AC.8020008@apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 04/07/2011 16:56, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 03/07/2011 15:14, eurotrans-Verlag wrote: >>>> 2) When using the ISAPI Redirector 1.2.32 and Tomcat Native 1.1.20 >>> which is >>>> included in the windows distribution, I get these errors when a >>> client makes >>>> a request to IIS which is redirected to Tomcat, resulting in 100% CPU >>> usage >>>> by tomcat's process: >>> >>> Under what circumstances? Some requests, all requests? The APR/native >>> AJP connector works with mod_jk and mod_proxy_ajp on linux so it looks >>> like either the ISAPI redirector is sending something unexpected that >>> isn't handled well or the windows specific code in the APR/native >>> connector isn't handling something. >> >> For this test, I downloaded the Tomcat 7.0.17 (windows 64 bit) and extracted >> it to a directory. I didn't changed anything in the Tomcat directory (also >> not the config files). I set the ISAPI Redirector 1.2.32 to redirect all >> requests to Tomcat on port 8009, using ajp13. > > OK. I've set up IIS 7 and Tomcat 7.0.17 and I see the same thing. > > There has been some refactoring of the connector code but (famous last > words) it should have been harmless. I'm looking at this now... The problem has been found and fixed. I'm leaning towards stopping the 7.0.17 release and re-starting with a 7.0.18 tag. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org