Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4220659F for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92853 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 17:08:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 92752 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 17:08:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 92743 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 17:08:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:08:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.26 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:07:58 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QWAbx-0002O2-Ll for users@tomcat.apache.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:07:37 -0700 Message-ID: <31836121.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:07:37 -0700 (PDT) From: cowwoc To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: One process per webapp MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I posted a RFE at https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51366 asking for the ability to seamlessly deploy webapps into separate JVMs. Tomcat 7.0's parallel deployment sounds nice but it still doesn't solve the JNI and memory leak problems that haunt a single JVM architecture. Please read the proposal and let me know what you think. Thanks, Gili -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/One-process-per-webapp-tp31836121p31836121.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org