Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jessh@ptc.com designates
 12.11.148.84 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4DBFE39D.4020404@ptc.com>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 06:14:37 -0500
From: Jess Holle <jessh@ptc.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
CC: Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org>
Subject: Re: Async servlets and Tomcat 7 vs. mod_jk
References: <4DBF26F3.4080906@ptc.com> <4DBFBA52.30006@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <4DBFBA52.30006@apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------030501060906030403070802"

--------------030501060906030403070802
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 5/3/2011 3:18 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> As I write this it occurs to me that an AJP-NIO connector would be a big
> help to you here. I don't know how much work that would be to write but
> with the refactoring already completed for Tomcat 7 it might be as
> little as 1000 lines of code. If you would be interested in such a
> connector create an enhancement request in Bugzilla.
That would almost certainly be the biggest help to me, yes.  While I 
have nothing against Apache HTTPD or APR in theory, in practice native 
builds (and bugs) across numerous platforms are just too much to deal with.
>> In Apache, I note that there are noises about broader/better support for
>> the mod_event MPM worker.  Does mod_jk work with mod_event there to
>> reduce the threads required in Apache?
> Sorry, don't know. I have relatively little to do with the native mod_jk
> code.
Thanks.  I was hoping someone on this list could answer (Mladen?), but 
realize there are relatively few involved in mod_jk code.

--
Jess Holle


--------------030501060906030403070802--