Return-Path: 
 <users-return-221446-apmail-tomcat-users-archive=tomcat.apache.org@tomcat.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 31697 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 00:07:10 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 00:07:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 68867 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 00:07:07 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org
Received: (qmail 68621 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 00:07:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@tomcat.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@tomcat.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.tomcat.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org
Received: (qmail 68612 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2011 00:07:06 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:07:06 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ntierlogicprmer@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.216.45 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.216.45] (HELO mail-qw0-f45.google.com) (209.85.216.45)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:07:00 +0000
Received: by qwk4 with SMTP id 4so6403855qwk.18
        for <users@tomcat.apache.org>; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:06:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=mBex6pPjPVwjOq0DYGHSY6xX/g4NshXgucSrd8FtiKk=;
        b=QAtOR4XVDEnJzuO/Mcq0OU2FkvxLJNkBwBKxnCwunY5GrjDXmGnEnMrbNd+XbQL7GK
         Puku+zivC2zkyVHrhKQIpxla1sT8Ymo7RyahktQpJeuL6fso1TTZ+03nqJxvg/ztjF6X
         DwZBeHbM52grEWpPjHF4pteeKnTw5e/YXedPU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=cbLKxjYnfaogOI+LY5EutXpKusqp+5wYpflHCoHhSp+MbBKtZaemq9/VOf/ygs/Rw3
         FDpoEAk6H5CI0KB4z232frHt053jsfunlGpk6RsDTYquM/CjdWXYqmN3aSq+qhvwWM2x
         HLJZO+lcaxb6qzjzRxQyoPRqD8A1btysvNC04=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.60.74 with SMTP id o10mr5190233qah.317.1296518799407; Mon,
 31 Jan 2011 16:06:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.95.19 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:06:39 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:06:39 +0900
Message-ID: <AANLkTikiUBSi=qDBk3Ab_N+7rW5i6pp0x__piFRF4L2C@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: It makes problem when we use JSTL with 1.3 class to build on Oracle
 JDK6.
From: "Donggyu A. Lee" <ntierlogicprmer@gmail.com>
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I knew that Oracle JDK6 compile 1.3 Java source. But when that source
do not use generics, Oracle compiler sometimes seems to compile with
not <Object> but <String>.
It makes problem when we use JSTL with 1.3 class to build on Oracle JDK6.

Thanks. Very busy day to all because of 64bit or Generics.

--

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org