Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=2C/E3ZTSeUvXFKCymn/krCSg2J7aeSmB8Jwn7+W6O22KYjV12BNRaupwMPq+vV1J2aFN5zPLPxL3G/XHYnjvx11m33NraAwO3Low1xurIXUzn6JZJZh6NHb/zd5u1P0YECF+ogEDZUVWECGQKjxWaHzVU2SjU/3QfRUcL8arTy0=;
Message-ID: <279616.92578.qm@web113620.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
References: <821350.70020.qm@web113603.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
 <4D56CEEA.5090802@apache.org> <572496.5606.qm@web113607.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
 <4D56D549.7010009@apache.org> <219892.63404.qm@web113614.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
 <4D572019.3000901@pidster.com> <102325.84581.qm@web113614.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
 <4D57AA6D.1070807@apache.org> <217552.68461.qm@web113604.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
 <4D590648.1090508@pidster.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 04:32:41 -0800 (PST)
From: Tony Anecito <adanecito@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Performance Tuning Tomcat 7...
To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <4D590648.1090508@pidster.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

All I am showing is a very long chain of method calls for Jersey that seem to 
compose most of the overall time.

I suspect that the tests Mark was talking about where he got 50k requests did 
not have anything like what I am seeing.
Just shows Jersey is not capable of high throughput.

-Tony


----- Original Message ----
From: Pid <pid@pidster.com>
To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Sent: Mon, February 14, 2011 3:39:04 AM
Subject: Re: Performance Tuning Tomcat 7...

On 2/13/11 8:15 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> 
> Here is the link to the screenshot I tried to send as an attachement.
> 
> http://www.myuniportal.com/tomcatjerseyservletprofile.jpg

What are we looking for here?

I don't know if there's any optimisation possible in the
SocketProcessor.run() method in Tomcat.


If I were to consider what Jersey is doing, I'd look at why there's an
expensive ContainerResponse.write() call (costing 0.6ms) while it still
seems to be processing the request.


p

> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org>
> To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
> Sent: Sun, February 13, 2011 2:54:53 AM
> Subject: Re: Performance Tuning Tomcat 7...
> 
> On 13/02/2011 04:33, Tony Anecito wrote:
>> Thanks Pid.
>>
>> Odd though I did a GET with no attachments.
>> I do return a complex object but that is only the response not the request.
> 
> Pid meant that the mailing list strips attachments. We can't see the
> Visual VM output you are referring to.
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
>>
>> -Tony
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Pid <pid@pidster.com>
>> To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
>> Sent: Sat, February 12, 2011 5:04:41 PM
>> Subject: Re: Performance Tuning Tomcat 7...
>>
>> On 2/12/11 10:23 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
>>> I attached the screenshot of visualvm showing what I mean.
>>
>> The list strips attachments...
>>
>>
>> p


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org