Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 89303 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2010 20:09:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Dec 2010 20:09:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 29137 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2010 20:08:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 28928 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2010 20:08:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 28918 invoked by uid 99); 20 Dec 2010 20:08:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:08:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.82.249.131] (HELO mail28.messagelabs.com) (216.82.249.131) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:08:50 +0000 X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: Chuck.Caldarale@unisys.com X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-28.messagelabs.com!1292875696!120631604!4 X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.9; banners=-,-,- X-Originating-IP: [192.61.61.105] Received: (qmail 32543 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2010 20:08:24 -0000 Received: from naedge.unisys.com (HELO USEA-NAEDGE2.unisys.com) (192.61.61.105) by server-12.tower-28.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Dec 2010 20:08:24 -0000 Received: from usea-nahubcas2.na.uis.unisys.com (129.224.76.115) by USEA-NAEDGE2.unisys.com (192.61.61.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.83.0; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:08:16 -0600 Received: from USEA-EXCH8.na.uis.unisys.com ([129.224.76.42]) by usea-nahubcas2.na.uis.unisys.com ([129.224.76.115]) with mapi; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:08:17 -0600 From: "Caldarale, Charles R" To: Tomcat Users List Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:07:40 -0600 Subject: Re: IS that a good idea moving all the common libs? Thread-Topic: IS that a good idea moving all the common libs? Thread-Index: AcuggaLv+P0imrm0TmSMoZKPRVrqzg== Message-ID: References: <4D0F8F21.7060808@ashetic.net> In-Reply-To: <4D0F8F21.7060808@ashetic.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Dec 20, 2010, at 12:16, "Luca Gervasi" wrote: > I'm trying to lower the permgen needed by a large amount of webapps > moving all the commonly used libs to the tomcat common libs. That's a really, really bad idea. You would be intertwining all your webapp= s, potentially introducing object leaks across webapps, and creating insurm= ountable versioning issues. You'd also require a complete Tomcat restart to= update any single webapp. Webapps are intended to be independent; don't make your life miserable by t= ying them all together. If you need more PermGen space, configure it. If yo= u've got memory leaks, fix them. - Chuck --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org