Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=rIHXWVfHhLttU+HTA+2UVgb0w1z1UItq7F6o35n5dNaqbkZDaNGTlmrus1jmSg+frwZLoMnp8U8J5NKPuJoKzKwraB4+X2ZKpG3yIDlDyRpNyo6GjKWGl/c6Qg9Kz3GE2B0ht5udtCHRd2M2LtXRCRGWkrrXJsivKEH2kQFDAbw=;
Message-ID: <693033.99997.qm@web36503.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <56748.85236.qm@web36504.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
 <AANLkTinZhWCRHvNzsb9KZgWQzU7iuH7miAzWuOoF7WX_@mail.gmail.com>
 <73505.1769.qm@web36504.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4CF777E8.1090107@pidster.com>
 <175594.75190.qm@web36501.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4CF7F706.9020005@pidster.com>
 <843229.71453.qm@web36502.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4CF824A8.9050202@pidster.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 15:39:49 -0800 (PST)
From: Justin Case <send_lotsa_spam_here@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: automatic deployment without server.xml - bad request
To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <4CF824A8.9050202@pidster.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

> From: Pid <pid@pidster.com>
> 
> On 12/2/10 10:24 PM, Justin Case wrote:
> > Yeah I probably will do that -  but I will still regard it as a dirty 
hack...
> 
> A ROOT app should be  mandatory.

It's not - yet :) so I'm all legal without. But what do you think about the 400 
error? Is it really appropriate as answer in this setup? And is it really my 
particular need to write an application only to convert the 400 into 404? I'm 
just surprised...
...or maybe I should consider whether my application can be both root AND answer 
to the context...

Cheers,
JC


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org