Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 17726 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2010 10:06:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Dec 2010 10:06:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 94197 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2010 10:06:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 94103 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2010 10:06:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 94094 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2010 10:06:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:06:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.191.85.54] (HELO web36803.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (209.191.85.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:06:18 +0000 Received: (qmail 26644 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Dec 2010 10:05:55 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com.cn; s=s1024; t=1291197955; bh=wb8fFs0f1xh6LezW2cnh7DaNSMpvCueFes3YaN+v5W4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=WSlIYF0HXR0rZW1L6oX8QUlQTg5XrZWwjurXsIneC7kat1iWB+OeCAZgiDrwA4XZkzu5KWcN/2cClYM1XyIDtOUMbxy/0t2m2l2sz7ibrPehuS5zV3IjXXZzfj2g9nHz/UK8FJHVRXA4CDiY5eCe/2B2cXoe/2OgIuqofVCrNJs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.cn; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=E+URzp4ifRsHtF/3TybZh9v/BnVqFOHcFO2faCJpgc4pw+j5FWiU1ETO/mrP0icK75T8kQgkMfbosbDxJfg1RZy4D8z9kH/mDmqpD3+8vRbLL3NB/HEIf9oPxB5cay8dnfI+8u0zcxjOnAsnAk2LInttZCI0krsw8eUu8Lbinf0=; Message-ID: <505299.18655.qm@web36803.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 9TXo2VkVM1l9MMdIJCxaOEBsUEyP.373cZqHoL7sPxLYte9 MBlgO.cKse9zWAs_EX4bVxWmQ.nxsKnTRRMd8GPzwIXS.aAuEyQ3f2GDmhGA y4.m1nJL2gqfdC2509asNIh2w5I.k07_._d7MkwsuAIiD1EcO7LTjFEfjqpw RsulnVU_1fFmMFcQ4QV08J4oDTk6MHFNMh7jv9cg0irDiFwJfr3JzU4F8xhh tUuVmgSMrkwJk_nT6m756jTwvk6ceiebvtkV0idLTMKzvuBmmxc72nz5_Nfk Vy9EkVkZVA03D3d7JSisCp3GAcM5ZMj7RSxg2A4GcLvqH64bWUFvam9qVPtC SiA-- Received: from [121.8.155.118] by web36803.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 02:05:55 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/553 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 References: <495717.39808.qm@web36808.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4CF60D80.4000600@apache.org> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 02:05:55 -0800 (PST) From: shunhao chen Subject: =?utf-8?B?5Zue5aSN77yaIEhvdyB0byBydW4gdG9tY2F0IDUuNS45IGFzIGEgc2Vydmlj?= =?utf-8?B?ZSBpbiA2NC1iaXQgT1M/?= To: Tomcat Users List In-Reply-To: <4CF60D80.4000600@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-2016254434-1291197955=:18655" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-2016254434-1291197955=:18655 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Mark,=0A=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Many thanks for your reply. Upgrading seems i= s a good choice, but my app was =0Arunning since 2005,=C2=A0it is stable an= d=C2=A0I have not plan to upgrade=C2=A0tomcat. As we =0Aknown, we usually u= se the tomcat.exe to install tomcat service as a window =0Aservice.So, if I= =C2=A0choose to upgrade the service wrapper using commons-daemon,=C2=A0 is = =0Ait means=C2=A0I need to re-generate the tomcate.exe?=C2=A0Any instructio= ns?=C2=A0=C2=A0=0A=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =0A=0A=0A=0A__________________________= ______=0A=E5=8F=91=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA=EF=BC=9A Mark Thomas =0A=E6=94=B6=E4=BB=B6=E4=BA=BA=EF=BC=9A Tomcat Users List =0A=E5=8F=91=E9=80=81=E6=97=A5=E6=9C=9F=EF=BC=9A 2010/12/1 (=E5=91= =A8=E4=B8=89) 4:55:28 =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=88=0A=E4=B8=BB =E9=A2=98=EF=BC=9A Re:= How to run tomcat 5.5.9 as a service in 64-bit OS?=0A=0AOn 01/12/2010 08:4= 0, shunhao chen wrote:=0A> Hi all,=0A>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 I have a web app using = tomcat 5.5.9 as app server. All works well in 32-bit =0A=0A> OS. But now I = have to support this app running on 64-bit OS. So I change the =0A>JDK =0A>= =0A> to use a 64-bit version(jdk1.5.0_22). All works well, but when I run t= omcat as =0A>a =0A>=0A> service, it fails. =0A> =0A>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Can anybo= dy help?=0A=0A5.5.9 is very old and has a number of known security vulnerab= ilities.=0AYou should consider upgrading.=0A=0AThe architecture of the serv= ice wrapper must match the architecture of=0Athe JVM so you'll need the 64-= bit service wrapper. You can get that from=0Athe latest commons-daemon down= load.=0A=0AMark=0A=0A------------------------------------------------------= ---------------=0ATo unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.o= rg=0AFor additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org=0A=0A=0A= --0-2016254434-1291197955=:18655--