On 13/10/2010 19:14, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 10/12/2010 5:28 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 12/10/2010 19:45, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> markt marked this bug as FIXED, but I see no indication of a resolution.
>>> Perhaps that was meant to be WONTFIX?
>
>> Nope. I meant FIXED. As in "There is now an option you can use to
>> disable this behaviour if you don't like it".
>
> Gotcha. It wasn't clear from the comment that the fix was somewhat of a
> workaround.
>
> Any reason those buffers never release their memory?
I believe performance.
> Was the complexity
> of the proposed fix deemed too high for the rare cases where this
> problem occurs (that is, shoddy JSPs)?
I believe so but to be honest I haven't looked at the proposed fix for
quite some time.
> Finally, is this same technique
> used in Tomcat 6.x and is the same workaround available?
6.0.x and 7.0.x. Same workaround.
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
|