tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From laredotornado <laredotorn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Where do files served get logged?
Date Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:58:21 GMT

I haven't done any benchmarks, and I'm assuming some of the folks on this
thread are the Tomcat developers and can speak first hand to the speed.  If
so, I would encourage you to update the wiki ...

http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/Connectors

because it mentions that Apache is faster at serving static content than
Tomcat for high-traffic sites.  - Dave





Jeff Hubbs-2 wrote:
> 
>   On 10/14/10 12:08 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>>
>>> I'm trying to make sure Tomcat is not serving static
>>> files that Apache can serve more efficiently.
>> Why do you think httpd can serve them more efficiently?
> I recall from reading about Slashdot's architecture some years ago 
> (Perl/MySQL at the time) that they had separate servers running Tux for 
> static content...
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Where-do-files-served-get-logged--tp29963979p29964522.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org


Mime
View raw message