Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of wesley.acheson@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.216.173 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=tHDeok7lgMUuNCdUaulh/5jabXQA6iL85wCIWYsHLkC8fZxestmFW9SJNwwc1JE9k1
         u9bMF9UHin2tx4Qb2QOkDzv38ofDiKTOPRJJII34eTKFEiR7GMhyer08DQtgipskB88i
         StfpfOaHIdGx1gcw1oRQNL9tbV4TU2SNcmrjg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinqQ=0mEZTDDC9FPCorp1XB0z4UU6RCuEhiTYg2@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1C8E9B1CF17E43B9B869D63F4F134D45@michel>
	<4C80D0FB.3040308@gmail.com>
	<0805969DE9324E6084B55ACA62FA4991@michel>
	<AANLkTi=+LaM31Bk=niV7tTob4Vmnb19p9a_SN+q=QaXO@mail.gmail.com>
	<B0CC2FC9677244ED9A7C26E4E666032E@michel>
	<4C83A859.1030600@ice-sa.com>
	<2BF7AA4FFE424F1F83FB8DB84D0A77C9@michel>
	<4C83B97A.5050608@ice-sa.com>
	<AANLkTikP+e4tqkEMhR6cATgVoVAh0vVvksoFtwfdsuyz@mail.gmail.com>
	<2B0C320C45714AA09B991E6484918C1C@michel>
	<AANLkTim3fHYy2yTODAQUeRpAm6qoZyJaLDx0cHosCK6s@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C84AE38.4010006@pidster.com>
	<AANLkTinqQ=0mEZTDDC9FPCorp1XB0z4UU6RCuEhiTYg2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 12:40:07 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTinzahYMxvEyhMPjSeFQB36UrsDShP0A4Brni0uP@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: URL Rewrite
From: Wesley Acheson <wesley.acheson@gmail.com>
To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b8b6c69df55048f94e7a5

--0016363b8b6c69df55048f94e7a5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Please send a new email to the list rather than reply to an unrelated topic.

On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Subrat Kumar Pattnaik <
patnaik.subrat@gmail.com> wrote:

> I can not login to Apache Tomcat 7 manager....please tell me the
> configuration
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Pid <pid@pidster.com> wrote:
>
> > On 05/09/2010 23:40, Hassan Schroeder wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 3:23 PM, michel <compukat@videotron.ca> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Or, uh, just don't *ever* use relative links, period.
> > >
> > >> Sorry, but I don't understand why. In most cases relative links are
> > great,
> > >> simply because they are 'self-updating' when the page gets moved.
> > >
> > > ? Obviously not. If you move a page with relative links up or down
> > > a hierarchy (whether by actually moving it or referencing it from
> > > "somewhere else", as in this case) it's broken. Period.
> >
> > +1  Michel, you have this the wrong way round.
> >
> > >> Hard-coding is a last-resort solution.
> >
> > I don't believe I used relative links anywhere in the last 7 or 8 years.
> >
> > > No, it's the only sane way to write URLs. Sorry, I've spent too much
> > > time in the last 15 years fixing pointlessly broken stuff because other
> > > people thought the same thing.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > NB: if your best solution is to add the rarely* used <base href=, then
> > you are, in effect, causing the links to behave as absolute ones.
> >
> > * It's rare for a reason.
> >
> >
> > p
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Let everyday b a dream u can touch.
> Let everyday b a luv u can feel.
>
> Let everyday b a reason to live bcoz
> life indeed is beautiful.
>
> Have a Gud day.
>
> Subrat P.
> +91-9439518745
>

--0016363b8b6c69df55048f94e7a5--