tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Wesley Acheson <wesley.ache...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: URL Rewrite
Date Mon, 06 Sep 2010 10:40:07 GMT
Please send a new email to the list rather than reply to an unrelated topic.

On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Subrat Kumar Pattnaik <
patnaik.subrat@gmail.com> wrote:

> I can not login to Apache Tomcat 7 manager....please tell me the
> configuration
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Pid <pid@pidster.com> wrote:
>
> > On 05/09/2010 23:40, Hassan Schroeder wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 3:23 PM, michel <compukat@videotron.ca> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Or, uh, just don't *ever* use relative links, period.
> > >
> > >> Sorry, but I don't understand why. In most cases relative links are
> > great,
> > >> simply because they are 'self-updating' when the page gets moved.
> > >
> > > ? Obviously not. If you move a page with relative links up or down
> > > a hierarchy (whether by actually moving it or referencing it from
> > > "somewhere else", as in this case) it's broken. Period.
> >
> > +1  Michel, you have this the wrong way round.
> >
> > >> Hard-coding is a last-resort solution.
> >
> > I don't believe I used relative links anywhere in the last 7 or 8 years.
> >
> > > No, it's the only sane way to write URLs. Sorry, I've spent too much
> > > time in the last 15 years fixing pointlessly broken stuff because other
> > > people thought the same thing.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > NB: if your best solution is to add the rarely* used <base href=, then
> > you are, in effect, causing the links to behave as absolute ones.
> >
> > * It's rare for a reason.
> >
> >
> > p
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Let everyday b a dream u can touch.
> Let everyday b a luv u can feel.
>
> Let everyday b a reason to live bcoz
> life indeed is beautiful.
>
> Have a Gud day.
>
> Subrat P.
> +91-9439518745
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message