Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 2493 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2010 17:38:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Aug 2010 17:38:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 16260 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2010 17:38:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 16118 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2010 17:38:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 16109 invoked by uid 99); 20 Aug 2010 17:38:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:38:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of len.popp@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.45 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.45] (HELO mail-vw0-f45.google.com) (209.85.212.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:38:03 +0000 Received: by vws19 with SMTP id 19so3186392vws.18 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:37:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=JT7nFDc6NwpbeK6wzn88ML8nYS9qwQazeM/cCx24IaE=; b=LcusSTg5/pk2zuWfAmKJmxHOPvLfwhl9DEoHhmrBP0wD+S2n2amuMGAM7kPzNjxh/c /ayeRegQczzjjU5VqSeEG0p63xX5WCN2t6MGO6Ge22yshI7Sq9qkQKk9a13Glz7gQhNy 3z942QN/nCd5rFS+Z0c1wk+vQehVoA11Ccc/s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=YXm1Cvh543BdITWHd2if4dKMYBl6Du1uwb7V9RrRCmmaK6SLbo3tqukDu9pGBZ/gWj d8VKWkWqqnQQ3rg1uadCkubYpcrEKMx3eNc4zilKBUMZY1J6eii/Mi1iGueqvLU0Lern vu3SmSMfZ9UmcqSLlNjD9+BphV1WtR7U3DeRA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.128.68 with SMTP id j4mr1025809vcs.208.1282325862877; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:37:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.127.86 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:37:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C6EACD3.3020508@christopherschultz.net> References: <4C6EACD3.3020508@christopherschultz.net> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:37:42 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Tomcat Version Numbers From: Len Popp To: Tomcat Users List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:26, Christopher Schultz wrote: > It's not that I > don't get it... it's that I have a deep-seated need for the release > version to be called 7.0.0 for some reason. Call me cynical, but I naturally assume that a major new version will have more bugs (no matter how much beta testing was done), and I feel much safer installing a x.0.1 release. So I find the Tomcat numbering system more reassuring. :-) -- Len --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org