Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 87545 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2010 18:53:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Aug 2010 18:53:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 38153 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2010 18:53:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 38043 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2010 18:53:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 38034 invoked by uid 99); 2 Aug 2010 18:53:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 18:53:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 18:53:42 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Og08X-0008Jd-82 for users@tomcat.apache.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 11:53:21 -0700 Message-ID: <29328525.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 11:53:21 -0700 (PDT) From: imtrick To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Http 505 In-Reply-To: <2dfefcd21002092001i1bf36bfck5341f2ef1df63d9b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: patrick.morris@hp.com References: <2dfefcd21002092001i1bf36bfck5341f2ef1df63d9b@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org jgroups wrote: > > Tomcat 6 > > Our application non-java client (C/Java) are occassionally seeing > Http 505. But there is no such error being logged in the tomcat access > log. Clients are for sure seeing 505 but we are not so I am wondering > if someone can help me understand why that might be occuring? In the > response header they see: > > Response header: Apache-Coyote/1.1 > Response header: connection close > I'm curious if you ever found a solution to your problem. Since upgrading from Tomcat 6.0.20 to 6.0.28, we're seeing a similar issue, where URLs that worked fine before the upgrade are throwing 505's to clients. If we revert back to 5.0.30, the problem goes away. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Http-505-tp27525965p29328525.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org