Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 79834 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2010 23:15:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Jul 2010 23:15:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 43236 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2010 23:15:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 43158 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2010 23:15:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 43149 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2010 23:15:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 23:15:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of aw@ice-sa.com designates 212.85.38.228 as permitted sender) Received: from [212.85.38.228] (HELO tor.combios.es) (212.85.38.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 23:15:18 +0000 Received: from [192.168.245.152] (p549E1CB4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.158.28.180]) by tor.combios.es (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A67E7226172 for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 01:12:53 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C4A2259.30209@ice-sa.com> Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 01:14:33 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Warnier?= Reply-To: Tomcat Users List User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat Shutting Down by Itself? References: <768FEA3F936926468F594E3CA7741FE8024A629C@ipa-vault.nvipa.com> In-Reply-To: <768FEA3F936926468F594E3CA7741FE8024A629C@ipa-vault.nvipa.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Robinson, Eric wrote: > >> This Tomcat and Java are just trying to say, in the only >> way they can, that after some 10 years of good and hard >> labor, it is now time to retire them and have the burden >> taken over by a new generation. > > Yes, that's probably it. One of the... > > [root@app03 ~]# ps ax|grep java|wc -l > 164 > > ..164 instances of tomcat that are running on this server is bored with > being old and has decided to act up. The other 163 instances are lame > for insisting on working fine day after day. :-) > Out of memory ? (which is also something that happens frequently to old people, and to java programs) What I was trying to say above, in a devious but humoristic way, is that there are not a lot of people on this list running those versions anymore. There may not even be a lot of people on this list with any experience of running that anymore. Probably, any people with the experience of running these versions have been since promoted and don't have the time to be on this list anymore. So you are basically stuck with Chuck and me, and we are telling you that Tomcat does not shut down by itself. I'll add that when it shuts down properly, it usually says so in its logfiles. If it doesn't, then it must be that it is being brutally terminated (or euthanasied ?) by something else. Under Linux, there is some talk of an "OOM killer" character who has been known to do that kind of thing. When all these JVM instances are running, what does "free" say ? And while you're at it, go to the Tomcat bin subdirectory, and tell us what "version.sh" has to say. Another possibility on a Linux system, is that some smart /etc/init.d startup script for Tomcat redirects Tomcat's messages somewhere else, like /var/log/daemon.log. Have you been looking there ? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org