Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31810 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 17:18:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 17:18:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 89169 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 17:18:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 89005 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 17:18:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 88996 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 17:18:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:18:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hassan.schroeder@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.45 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.45] (HELO mail-pw0-f45.google.com) (209.85.160.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:18:19 +0000 Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so1235228pwi.18 for ; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:17:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hlDcC5wU+BbqBQ2CL77Xd2biIYlY4ETDVrouXrkVbxk=; b=NXUFjqryyNYs7OWOyaHqmMI8dbqSjjRDazff8C3FwC0j86iypFQq1951c3VhSdBAtn BxRCqdprvFf7bleMCpqKWqYmDKvxyV+KHw9yeVxeVPHSGoDr0ZXa9sROQMRsDdpv7nV4 xusYQc8//mpkbJmMdg2359E2/azZT7fJoblow= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=cti9PJlaq9fPGOr2zY2MnHjcoURHsrsuLJj3eS48l4yaRprA5gpRX1dS04o4uFbMaI 0Gv9lcsK8ky1mB/DsmjFPlU9PRdY2Sock1826/yi7ia0p5q6zVLNtzwiq7FdMDTsKzIf qKnqcYHJ7KPEFCTeOpXQqsU2tht0JS13UESSA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.167.7 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 10:17:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4BB4BC4E.4020907@ice-sa.com> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 10:17:58 -0700 Received: by 10.142.119.33 with SMTP id r33mr385918wfc.213.1270142278867; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:17:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: RemoteHostValve for infinite domains? & Patch submit question... From: Hassan Schroeder To: Tomcat Users List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Dean Hiller wrote: > yes, interesting, unfortunately, I am running our QA and customer demo > machine behind comcast at home so there is only one ip, though it would work > for our production environment. Then you could use the same 2-Engine setup there with 2 local IPs, one for each Engine, and Apache httpd in front of Tomcat as a proxy. -- Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ hassan.schroeder@gmail.com twitter: @hassan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org