Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 26044 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2010 16:57:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 16:57:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 50166 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 16:57:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 50116 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2010 16:57:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 50107 invoked by uid 99); 1 Apr 2010 16:57:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:57:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hassan.schroeder@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.178] (HELO mail-pz0-f178.google.com) (209.85.222.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:56:55 +0000 Received: by pzk8 with SMTP id 8so1262004pzk.16 for ; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 09:56:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dRjLj1SeKA1wWz5aua+dvFLCRpr8x1mU4YmFczNP8rs=; b=Dj2YV2FVk9IYEdN7IUkYLfHaTs3zh6ZgGwjCMenhAOr8t3oLqXGSfkMg3FAA+z3CqI s1QFm4SqaEqqn0PMrsB02PBEW3NtM3upY5gonSNb/T+V0Mdu0rtILkxzKzHhT2BNP3Gi Q7a4sMHSFQatX4AbBAo/mwBr3Sef3Tw1ImDjU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=FuRvnJJsqumTidJOKDA3nJqhGysj+eayXSP8VkoiUR+kWdUBzAAsXuXbVZkwcTFwq/ glaMcrRynSdYtAoi/eP79514K95iKzcHXrkMSm3NeqmB88FTIwi0IAh5+zm8Fc/RfzK1 7Lci6s7DYulXq0xS9Kx0gtX+JdIalUwmQrg2U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.167.7 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 09:56:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4BB4BC4E.4020907@ice-sa.com> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 09:56:34 -0700 Received: by 10.142.119.33 with SMTP id r33mr369142wfc.213.1270140994222; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 09:56:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: RemoteHostValve for infinite domains? & Patch submit question... From: Hassan Schroeder To: Tomcat Users List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Dean Hiller wrote: > I like the ip idea(except for needing two tomcats). You don't need 2 tomcats; a connector can be told to listen on a specific IP... > Two services in tomcat doesn't work as then we would need different ports > which is definintely not something we want. .. in which case you don't need non-standard ports, either. -- Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ hassan.schroeder@gmail.com twitter: @hassan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org