Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4B8BA461.10906@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:26:25 +0000
From: Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
 rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100216 Thunderbird/3.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: unified doXXX()
References: <4B89CE2A.3000104@gmail.com> <4B8A8B17.2050200@pidster.com>
 <4B8B744C.9080608@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B8B744C.9080608@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 01/03/2010 08:01, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
> Pid wrote:

>>>
>>> I want to preserve the single handler design but since getParameter
>>> barfs on our new input format and there is no unified raw input reader
>>> the only thing I can think of is make it so doGet and doPost use
>>> request.getQueryString() and request.getReader() respectivally... is
>>> there an easier way? (namely I want to keep doXXX as pure wrappers with
>>> nothing but a dispatch to handleRequest()).
>>
>> Why does request.getParameter() not work, or is that a secret?

Take a look at SRV.3.1 in the servlet spec. Are you sure you are using 
application/x-www-form-urlencoded with your POST?

If you use that content type, Tomcat will merge parameters in the POST 
body and the query string.

Mark


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org