Return-Path: 
 <users-return-207525-apmail-tomcat-users-archive=tomcat.apache.org@tomcat.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 1879 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2010 22:23:51 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2010 22:23:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 89044 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2010 22:23:48 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org
Received: (qmail 88984 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2010 22:23:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@tomcat.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@tomcat.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.tomcat.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org
Received: (qmail 88973 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2010 22:23:47 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:23:47 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [81.103.221.49] (HELO mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com)
 (81.103.221.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:23:37 +0000
Received: from know-smtpout-3.server.virginmedia.net ([62.254.123.3])
          by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com
          (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP
          id
 <20100126222317.PEKB10950.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@know-smtpout-3.server.virginmedia.net>
          for <users@tomcat.apache.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:23:17 +0000
Received: from [209.59.127.23] (helo=s2-laptop.local)
	by know-smtpout-3.server.virginmedia.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <markt@apache.org>)
	id 1NZtob-0005MY-5s
	for users@tomcat.apache.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:23:17 +0000
Message-ID: <4B5F6B53.1000002@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:23:15 -0400
From: Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
 rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: JasperException in 6.0.24 with JSF tag
References: 
 <02738CCB0516AA4DB10D40CC92B19D9F44E9B3CBAD@MBX12.EXCHPROD.USA.NET>
In-Reply-To: 
 <02738CCB0516AA4DB10D40CC92B19D9F44E9B3CBAD@MBX12.EXCHPROD.USA.NET>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=1ggfb5FlKZQUfF3vzm9UBYZ2uTfLsbs/8dSljwg5+mE=
 c=1 sm=0 a=qLh7v6dQSNQA:10 a=dUDdqn_blLTHXf7ClMgA:9
 a=W3qsSCkDoyAN0fkDlHt23QwVmacA:4 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On 26/01/2010 13:26, Michael Heinen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I recently updated from Tomcat 6.0.20 to 6.0.24.
> Now some jsps with jsf tags are not compiling anymore.
> 
> Following tag results in a JasperException in 6.0.24 but compiles fine with older versions:
> 
> <h:outputText value="\\">
> 
<snip/>

> Question:
> Should I file a bug for this or is this expected behavior?

That looks like a regression to me. (And it is probably my fault.
Sorry.) Please file a bug report.

Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org