Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kranti.parisa@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.223.172 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        b=kNq4EdTrrfr195NB8yFjsRpbjZGKXB9jF8hCBwyj3xE6EjbfEag6xJW26VPaKjNVK1
         nFK/rjjZI9NHDQdAKrY+wlbOVmxdNmWBNwRrVUGOMmzfqUTS9wBS1/KEiefgHVH7kg7L
         +vU3lRp3kzPfk1oduvBaVx0ygDHzVgW1MU/1o=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4B583AD8.1010409@ice-sa.com>
References: <4478b4ac1001210304r7633bfe8t9fa4b9db6d0ee68b@mail.gmail.com>
	<e0c148a1001210316m587a4a56s84b8513804943151@mail.gmail.com>
	<4B583AD8.1010409@ice-sa.com>
From: =?windows-1252?Q?Kranti=99_K_K_Parisa?= <kranti.parisa@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:44:51 +0530
Message-ID: <4478b4ac1001210714m652cfa37rb16c06af92f64007@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Securing Tomcat Applications from Reverse Engineering
To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0050450158d74f814f047dae2bc7

--0050450158d74f814f047dae2bc7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Well there are soo many comments on the cost of IP and other tools. when we
are a small team started working on a web based product with open source
tools, for sure we can't spend too much on the tools to protect the IP
rights. because once we deploy for few clients, if its a good product, what
if they steal the code and also ideas. i agree to have legal terms and all
that stuff. but that would be a big story for us being small.

so just wanted to see if anything available to protect our work, ideas
(ideas at code implementation level by using different opensource
technologies, well there are many companies who started like this).

anyways thanks for the comments, i would love to share if we invent anythin=
g
in this process, because small is big and it matters :)

Best Regards,
Kranti K K Parisa


On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Andr=E9 Warnier <aw@ice-sa.com> wrote:

> Peter Crowther wrote:
>
>> 2010/1/21 Kranti=99 K K Parisa <kranti.parisa@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>> How could we achieve this without the above tool? Because the pricing o=
f
>>> the
>>> above tool is very costly.
>>>
>>> Well, you could always spend the developer-years to create your own
>>> version
>>>
>> of that tool... which would probably be *more* costly.
>>
>
>
> I'll add something to that, just for the sake of it.
> I personally find this situation ironic : here we have someone who wants =
to
> protect their own code, presumably so that they can charge the customer f=
or
> a copy of it, in order to get back their cost of development and some
> justified profit for their work.
> But the same people are apparently unwilling to pay for a product that
> would allow them to do so, and is sold on the same terms.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>

--0050450158d74f814f047dae2bc7--