Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 19504 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2009 10:44:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Dec 2009 10:44:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 12820 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2009 10:44:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 12742 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2009 10:44:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 12731 invoked by uid 99); 4 Dec 2009 10:44:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:44:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mike.looijmans@oce.com designates 65.55.88.13 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.55.88.13] (HELO TX2EHSOBE006.bigfish.com) (65.55.88.13) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:44:50 +0000 Received: from mail149-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.242) by TX2EHSOBE006.bigfish.com (10.9.40.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.340.0; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:44:28 +0000 Received: from mail149-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail149-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91C63B8638 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:44:27 +0000 (UTC) X-SpamScore: -13 X-BigFish: VPS-13(zz542N1432Ra0dJ9370J8c8aizz1202hzzz31n6bh61h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0 Received: from mail149-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail149-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 125992346588196_20026; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:44:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TX2EHSMHS040.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.247]) by mail149-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1200294805A for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:44:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oce-exbhcs03a.oce.net (193.138.13.20) by TX2EHSMHS040.bigfish.com (10.9.99.140) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.0.482.32; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:44:24 +0000 Received: from oce-exbe03-v.oce.net ([10.95.4.106]) by oce-exbhcs03a.oce.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:44:23 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Tomcat Crashes out of continuous servicing of stuck request Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:44:22 +0100 Message-ID: <948126CDFED9634D8B12AF27F009EDC501C87EE7@oce-exbe03-v.oce.net> In-Reply-To: <4D8250A64CBB31419B00B80AE5B319A715EF7EEF9E@INBOMW77M1MSX.in002.siemens.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Tomcat Crashes out of continuous servicing of stuck request thread-index: Acp0xlLTQMXf8GmoTjKd/kn4vk/TXQAAb82AAAGcXeA= References: <4D8250A64CBB31419B00B80AE5B319A715EF7EEF9D@INBOMW77M1MSX.in002.siemens.net> <4B18D9DB.4050201@kippdata.de> <4D8250A64CBB31419B00B80AE5B319A715EF7EEF9E@INBOMW77M1MSX.in002.siemens.net> From: "Looijmans, Mike" To: "Tomcat Users List" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Dec 2009 10:44:23.0763 (UTC) FILETIME=[BE430A30:01CA74CE] X-Reverse-DNS: smtp02.oce.com Just an idea: What happens if you change your DB call into a "Sleep(30)" or something similar? Does tomcat still misbehave then? (the 'retry' could be related to something else than tomcat). M > -----Original Message----- > From: Hadole, Nishant IN BOM SISL [mailto:Nishant.Hadole@siemens.com] = > Sent: vrijdag 04 december 2009 11:06 > To: 'Rainer Jung'; Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: Tomcat Crashes out of continuous servicing of = > stuck request > = > Dear Rainer, > = > Thanks for explanation. In this particular case, when client = > press a button on JSP, it initiates a Database search = > operation, which may take time up to 30-45 seconds. = > Meanwhile, we are showing a screen which tell user that his / = > her request is being processed and no to close the window. = > = > But, sometimes users are impatient and still close the = > window. Yes, as you suggested, it is possible to handle close = > event / stop processing by some notification, but application = > is full of such utilities, and it is too much of efforts. > = > I am interested in some parameterization, which detects = > broken connection and automatically drops stuck request. I = > have even checked this with requests with STAGE as KEEPALIVE, = > but not working with STAGE as SERVICE. Also, I am not able to = > figure out, why the processing is repeated. > = > With best regards, > Nishant Hadole > Mailto: Nishant.Hadole@siemens.com This message and attachment(s) are intended solely for use by the addressee= and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise = exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or agent thereof responsible for deli= vering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that= any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strict= ly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender = immediately by telephone and with a 'reply' message. Thank you for your co-operation. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org