Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49644 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2009 14:01:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Dec 2009 14:01:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 87510 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2009 14:00:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 87481 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2009 14:00:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 87470 invoked by uid 99); 22 Dec 2009 14:00:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:00:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:00:22 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NN5HO-0005Sa-89 for users@tomcat.apache.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:00:02 -0800 Message-ID: <26888782.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:00:02 -0800 (PST) From: DOrlov To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: TomCat 6 performance issues In-Reply-To: <353769790912220554h7cab65edm510149b4e9311b3d@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: dorlov@redaril.com References: <26884227.post@talk.nabble.com> <353769790912220554h7cab65edm510149b4e9311b3d@mail.gmail.com> anthonyvierra wrote: > > Has the issue come from a single server? Or do you have a second > machine producing the same result? > > I have another production box with different code, but same TomCat configuration. And time to time I have the same issues. TomCat server side code on another box works fast enough (<5 ms per request) -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/TomCat-6-performance-issues-tp26884227p26888782.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org