Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 73658 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2009 16:13:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2009 16:13:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 29848 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 16:13:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 29783 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2009 16:13:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 29772 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2009 16:13:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:13:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of aw@ice-sa.com designates 212.85.38.228 as permitted sender) Received: from [212.85.38.228] (HELO tor.combios.es) (212.85.38.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:12:57 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tor.combios.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB46A22609F for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:12:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from tor.combios.es ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tor.combios.es [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NNz-42J1AP0u for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:12:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.245.129] (montserrat.wissensbank.com [212.85.37.175]) by tor.combios.es (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7E8F722608D for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:12:36 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4AF990F3.6090102@ice-sa.com> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:12:35 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andr=E9_Warnier?= Reply-To: aw@ice-sa.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration References: <26264069.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AF93ADE.50109@kippdata.de> <26283383.post@talk.nabble.com> <4AF9710A.4050102@kippdata.de> In-Reply-To: <4AF9710A.4050102@kippdata.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Rainer Jung wrote: > On 10.11.2009 14:26, thomas2004 wrote: >>> Remove the socket_timeout. Please let us know, whether that helped. >> I've moved the socket_timeout and the reply_timeout two days ago but it >> doesn't help. > ... Hi. Just my Tomcat- and Java-dummy look on this. As I understand the basic issue, there is a request coming through Apache for a document to be served by a Tomcat app. mod_jk forwards the request to Tomcat, and the Tomcat app can take upward of 20 minutes to produce the response (which is a PDF document). In the meantime, some timeout seems to occur at the front-end Apache or mod_jk level, and the user never gets his document. Now, is the problem not due to the fact that after receiving the request, Tomcat + webapp does not send back *anything* for more than 20 minutes ? Is there no possibility to have Tomcat + webapp return at least *something* in the meantime, to avoid this timeout ? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org