Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 85399 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2009 14:06:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Oct 2009 14:06:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 21839 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2009 14:06:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 21752 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2009 14:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 21741 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2009 14:06:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:06:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bocalinda@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.216 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.216] (HELO mail-ew0-f216.google.com) (209.85.219.216) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:05:58 +0000 Received: by ewy12 with SMTP id 12so3688106ewy.0 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:05:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=IAvRYyyS8O0elSfyJvXZlPkK9lN5WeeijcPhYaw4VFw=; b=s0fbtIn3uUtHW0LAvKRXqLowHgi2ua5MVjWEJJO59sGs+/deaFfLrXt0+jpTXLo/uW WkXez2pzkbNJ9HtUIHt7l6OWY7WBTxmdqgw7p2Ogpe0vE6Cl9SjGfpsf+2VethxILhvi 7tLzWIbp5INzglL6RBZNKHbg/6mkk3Aii27Mg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=KaAIJizcsZvOs3vea57wlyQ4c9uw0HRgAFU9shqmMi0N6CQnSeDoK3UvqDKn6zYKiN 5IWE0s3oLn4VHnlFyOFMKQSVRMOWbzKUaXo3muIp7ahRLheq5m5gPHjBDfQ//GxiDHS+ hDm4Vv+A9nFEttE7wSZBE65QhZKeyxOHVhccY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.211.143.10 with SMTP id v10mr10379716ebn.57.1255529135887; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:05:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <99C8B2929B39C24493377AC7A121E21F84054C1363@USEA-EXCH8.na.uis.unisys.com> <99C8B2929B39C24493377AC7A121E21F84054C139C@USEA-EXCH8.na.uis.unisys.com> <4AC77105.4010506@kippdata.de> <4AC7A1FA.5070405@kippdata.de> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:05:35 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Connection between ListenerStart and clustering From: Bocalinda To: Tomcat Users List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502c8b32655300475e5a8dd --00504502c8b32655300475e5a8dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Rainer, I'm sorry for the long delay in getting back to you. I got sidetracked by another issue and wasn't able to look into this earlier. However, the bad news is that the administrators didn't allow me to apply the patch as it is a production server. I can apply it to pre-production, but the error isn't reproducable there... 2nd however; It's been 12 days since we've seen the listenerStart error due to the classDefNotFound (in production). I need to check with the developers whether they accidentily made any changes that might have solved this problem. It might as well be that we have been lucky and that the error starts appearing again tomorrow. I will try to reproduce the problem in another server, in order to try out the patch you supplied. Thanks again. 2009/10/3 Bocalinda > Wow, that's what is called a quick turn around! :) > Thanks. I'll try as soon as possible and let you know. > > 2009/10/3 Rainer Jung > > On 03.10.2009 18:11, Bocalinda wrote: >> > Hi Rainer. >> > >> > >> >> I remember problems with clustering which were of the following kind: >> >> session replication data was received on a node although the context >> >> wasn't yet fully initialized. >> >> >> >> Maybe we run into classloader troubles in that case? >> >> >> >> This could only happen if another node in the cluster is running all >> the >> >> time between stop and restart of the node, which logs the exception. >> >> >> >> This could certainly be the case as I have 4 nodos in cluster. I >> > stop/restart one by one, in order to ensure the availability of the >> webapp. >> > >> > >> >> How easy can your reproduce the problem? In case I provide a patch, >> >> could you test, whether the problem goes away? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Taking into account that this is a production server, it won't be easy >> to >> > play with it, but I can propose to take 2 nodes out of the cluster to do >> > testing with. >> >> You can find a patched catalina-ha.jar and in case you are interested >> also the respective source code file at >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/tc6-cluster-context-startup-order.zip >> >> I did a one to one port from TC 5.5 to TC 6.0. So please test carefully >> and let us know the results, so we can include the patch into the >> standard code in case it proves it helps. >> >> Regards, >> >> Rainer >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org >> >> > --00504502c8b32655300475e5a8dd--