Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
From: Leo Donahue - PLANDEVX <LeoDonahue@mail.maricopa.gov>
To: 'Tomcat Users List' <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:55:49 -0700
Subject: RE: Installing Tomcat: how much do versions matter?
Thread-Topic: Installing Tomcat: how much do versions matter?
Thread-Index: AcpCguCc7J3EoYH0RVqFhJtnxgeF5gBAlbKQ
Message-ID: 
 <D72C174D3CAC0A4E812FAD012D646E9F104D5E056A@CMS1.enterprise.maricopa.gov>
References: <25696421.post@talk.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <25696421.post@talk.nabble.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

That sounds like ArcIMS 4.0?  Wow.  I would wait until your newer release o=
f ArcIMS arrives. =20

Unless you are going to maintain shapefiles as your datasource, you won't g=
et any support from ESRI if you plan on connecting ArcIMS 4.0 to some newer=
 version of ArcSDE.
http://support.esri.com/index.cfm?fa=3Dknowledgebase.techArticles.articleSh=
ow&d=3D22741

I can say that for IIS6, I have ArcIMS 9.3.1, Tomcat 6.0.20 and Java 1.6 wo=
rking without issue in which Tomcat and Java are newer versions than the ES=
RI specs for this version of ArcIMS.  http://support.esri.com/index.cfm?fa=
=3Dknowledgebase.techarticles.articleShow&d=3D35014

If you are going to be using the ArcIMS Java ADF, I would stick to the vers=
ions ESRI recommends in their doc, unless you know how to add support for n=
ewer Servlet and JSTL versions. =20

However, ESRI has a doc for that also:  http://support.esri.com/index.cfm?f=
a=3Dknowledgebase.techarticles.articleShow&d=3D33438

Leo

-----Original Message-----
From: Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman [mailto:kreshna_iceheart@yahoo.com]=20
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 3:35 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Installing Tomcat: how much do versions matter?


I need to install the following components on Windows XP (for ArcIMS):
1) Apache 2.0.43 (MSI installer for Windows, no crypto)
2) JSDK 1.4.1_01
3) Tomcat 4.1.12
4) mod_jk2-2.0.43.dll

Problem is, Apache 2.0.43 and Tomcat 4.1.12 are just _nowhere_ to be found.
These are what I got instead:
1) Apache 2.0.63  (MSI installer for Windows, no crypto)
2) JSDK 1.4.1_01
3) Tomcat 4.1.40
4) mod_jk2-2.0.43.dll

The Tomcat 4.1.40 is the JDK 1.4 version, so I think (or hope) there should=
 be no problem with that. However, the Apache is 2.0.63, while the mod_jk2 =
connector is clearly named mod_jk2-2.0.43.dll. Will I be able to run everyt=
hing smoothly, or will they just fail?

What if I go with newest version of every component instead? Thus, I'll be
using:
1) Apache 2.2.13
2) JSDK 6u16
3) Tomcat 6.0.20
4) mod_jk-1.2.28-httpd-2.2.3.so
Are those safe choices?
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Installing-Tomcat%3A-ho=
w-much-do-versions-matter--tp25696421p25696421.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org