Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47704 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2009 17:41:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Oct 2009 17:41:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 49785 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2009 17:41:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 49713 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2009 17:41:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 49702 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2009 17:41:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:41:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [88.198.36.7] (HELO mail2.ddt-consult.de) (88.198.36.7) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:40:54 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ddt-consult.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7AEF400256 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:40:55 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail Received: from mail2.ddt-consult.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.ddt-consult.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id AfCh1ezUlzhg for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:40:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.42.106] (p579BF537.dip.t-dialin.net [87.155.245.55]) (Authenticated sender: mks@list-post.mks-mail.de) by mail2.ddt-consult.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0938B400244 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:40:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4ADCA490.2010106@list-post.mks-mail.de> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:40:32 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWFya3VzIFNjaMO2bmhhYmVy?= Reply-To: users@tomcat.apache.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de-DE; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090817 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: What is the difference between running Tomcat 6 as a Windows Service vs. running from the command line? References: <4a951aa00910190833q6234a3ceo8c906db35a2dab79@mail.gmail.com> <4ADC934A.4070208@list-post.mks-mail.de> <4a951aa00910190940ydcd5d7arb5b739f074679700@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4a951aa00910190940ydcd5d7arb5b739f074679700@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Alan Kennedy: > Unfortunately, it did not solve the problem: the behaviour is exactly > the same when running under my own account: the bug still occurs. Well, that seems to rule out any permission problems - and leaves me pretty much out of ideas. One thing, though: do you run Tomcat in both cases from the same installation (same binary, same config etc.)? If not, maybe that's where the difference is. -- Regards mks --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org