Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 7215 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2009 10:45:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Oct 2009 10:45:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 14805 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2009 10:45:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 14728 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2009 10:45:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 14717 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2009 10:45:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:45:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of aw@ice-sa.com designates 212.85.38.228 as permitted sender) Received: from [212.85.38.228] (HELO tor.combios.es) (212.85.38.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:45:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tor.combios.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77793226087 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 12:44:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tor.combios.es ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tor.combios.es [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RTZxP3RYA2ih for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 12:44:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.245.129] (p549EA6DE.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.158.166.222]) by tor.combios.es (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2F2C422608B for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 12:44:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4AC48805.5060209@ice-sa.com> Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:44:21 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Warnier?= Reply-To: Tomcat Users List User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Installing Tomcat: how much do versions matter? References: <25696421.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <25696421.post@talk.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman wrote: > I need to install the following components on Windows XP (for ArcIMS): > 1) Apache 2.0.43 (MSI installer for Windows, no crypto) > 2) JSDK 1.4.1_01 > 3) Tomcat 4.1.12 > 4) mod_jk2-2.0.43.dll > > Problem is, Apache 2.0.43 and Tomcat 4.1.12 are just _nowhere_ to be found. > These are what I got instead: > 1) Apache 2.0.63 (MSI installer for Windows, no crypto) > 2) JSDK 1.4.1_01 > 3) Tomcat 4.1.40 > 4) mod_jk2-2.0.43.dll > > The Tomcat 4.1.40 is the JDK 1.4 version, so I think (or hope) there should > be no problem with that. However, the Apache is 2.0.63, while the mod_jk2 > connector is clearly named mod_jk2-2.0.43.dll. Will I be able to run > everything smoothly, or will they just fail? > > What if I go with newest version of every component instead? Thus, I'll be > using: > 1) Apache 2.2.13 > 2) JSDK 6u16 > 3) Tomcat 6.0.20 > 4) mod_jk-1.2.28-httpd-2.2.3.so > Are those safe choices? Definitely. Why would you start with versions (as you mention at the beginning) which are at least 5 years old, and most of them not developed and not maintained and not supported anymore ? (Apache 2.0.63 being, I think, the only exception here). Contrary to what the numbering may lead you to believe, mod_jk2.x is a different product, older than mod_jk-1.2.28, and it is no longer developed nor supported. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org