tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman <kreshna_icehe...@yahoo.com>
Subject RE: Installing Tomcat: how much do versions matter?
Date Sat, 03 Oct 2009 05:19:44 GMT

Hi, yes. We're going to maintain shapefiles anyway, hence the 4.0 version.
After all, it's just for demo purpose in my laptop :D



Leo Donahue - PLANDEVX wrote:
> 
> That sounds like ArcIMS 4.0?  Wow.  I would wait until your newer release
> of ArcIMS arrives.  
> 
> Unless you are going to maintain shapefiles as your datasource, you won't
> get any support from ESRI if you plan on connecting ArcIMS 4.0 to some
> newer version of ArcSDE.
> http://support.esri.com/index.cfm?fa=knowledgebase.techArticles.articleShow&d=22741
> 
> I can say that for IIS6, I have ArcIMS 9.3.1, Tomcat 6.0.20 and Java 1.6
> working without issue in which Tomcat and Java are newer versions than the
> ESRI specs for this version of ArcIMS. 
> http://support.esri.com/index.cfm?fa=knowledgebase.techarticles.articleShow&d=35014
> 
> If you are going to be using the ArcIMS Java ADF, I would stick to the
> versions ESRI recommends in their doc, unless you know how to add support
> for newer Servlet and JSTL versions.  
> 
> However, ESRI has a doc for that also: 
> http://support.esri.com/index.cfm?fa=knowledgebase.techarticles.articleShow&d=33438
> 
> Leo
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman [mailto:kreshna_iceheart@yahoo.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 3:35 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Installing Tomcat: how much do versions matter?
> 
> 
> I need to install the following components on Windows XP (for ArcIMS):
> 1) Apache 2.0.43 (MSI installer for Windows, no crypto)
> 2) JSDK 1.4.1_01
> 3) Tomcat 4.1.12
> 4) mod_jk2-2.0.43.dll
> 
> Problem is, Apache 2.0.43 and Tomcat 4.1.12 are just _nowhere_ to be
> found.
> These are what I got instead:
> 1) Apache 2.0.63  (MSI installer for Windows, no crypto)
> 2) JSDK 1.4.1_01
> 3) Tomcat 4.1.40
> 4) mod_jk2-2.0.43.dll
> 
> The Tomcat 4.1.40 is the JDK 1.4 version, so I think (or hope) there
> should be no problem with that. However, the Apache is 2.0.63, while the
> mod_jk2 connector is clearly named mod_jk2-2.0.43.dll. Will I be able to
> run everything smoothly, or will they just fail?
> 
> What if I go with newest version of every component instead? Thus, I'll be
> using:
> 1) Apache 2.2.13
> 2) JSDK 6u16
> 3) Tomcat 6.0.20
> 4) mod_jk-1.2.28-httpd-2.2.3.so
> Are those safe choices?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Installing-Tomcat%3A-how-much-do-versions-matter--tp25696421p25696421.html
> Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Installing-Tomcat%3A-how-much-do-versions-matter--tp25696421p25725875.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org


Mime
View raw message