Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 65480 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2009 13:34:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Sep 2009 13:34:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 49309 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2009 13:34:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 49248 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2009 13:34:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 49185 invoked by uid 99); 2 Sep 2009 13:34:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:34:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jamez556@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.194 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.194] (HELO mail-pz0-f194.google.com) (209.85.222.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:33:59 +0000 Received: by pzk32 with SMTP id 32so803052pzk.33 for ; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 06:33:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ZuPaaylIqA70HiXk+cj1IRSkTxGGjwMCpaYQ2IQ2J9o=; b=YC7gD66ztGJoj/rOrhVERzMJzg4krrwx1m+sY2FPSSSZUnnjdPdl39lSp+f9n9sOjR RBmzeTYNU4PjmU4WTLUdeSkhyJpRRB/ese9fhm0zzbcK+RtMnd8BBbCkzHrCGO/vkBsh 2m9Asimhshw7Jat30uL+bNbmfPheS9xoKZ2ys= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Phv9vxnhZEXJ6pLrei49HZzOL5YuerVkQXIxcw4zsH4nr4paUQAZ/jllnBczcQcoCE gWPy+OtTfAIdXLtCheclcra0GkRsuBgxjI3KzUQq/E/jFsWxHhzM1muur59N7KhgO4GS jTt/0s9gHhmQ6KpFp3hQRQNRM4WpQaMcQb5E0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.199.6 with SMTP id w6mr2379902rvf.159.1251898416622; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 06:33:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <99C8B2929B39C24493377AC7A121E21F83EE1F3354@USEA-EXCH8.na.uis.unisys.com> References: <317f309c0908302040red2f53dv1b0af640e8a8f2c5@mail.gmail.com> <4A9BE078.8080807@christopherschultz.net> <317f309c0908311927i5aea6cbcq57c3e2b368029a92@mail.gmail.com> <4A9D3D27.2070309@christopherschultz.net> <317f309c0909011010g7e3f3a4eve9ef1d0ab5020b57@mail.gmail.com> <4A9D6225.9050906@christopherschultz.net> <317f309c0909011920p478a6cebtdeacda21368cf893@mail.gmail.com> <99C8B2929B39C24493377AC7A121E21F83EE1F3354@USEA-EXCH8.na.uis.unisys.com> Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 21:33:36 +0800 Message-ID: <317f309c0909020633h434e6802u3ba07e78934f1b3f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: tomcat 4.1.31 problem From: jamez smith To: Tomcat Users List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd2171e6aed6b04729850e7 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd2171e6aed6b04729850e7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Good day Chunk, > > >>Have you actually tried compiling under 1.5 or 1.6? You might be > surprised at how few problems there are. > > I could try to compile under 1.5. But I dare not to use it in production > box, as this project is well controlled by the company. Every step I do > need to be documented. I have no right to change the fundamental framework > or JDK at all. :-( > Jamez. --000e0cd2171e6aed6b04729850e7--