From users-return-200476-apmail-tomcat-users-archive=tomcat.apache.org@tomcat.apache.org Fri Aug 14 14:47:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 98538 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2009 14:47:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Aug 2009 14:47:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 2175 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2009 14:47:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 2096 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2009 14:47:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 2085 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2009 14:47:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:47:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.62.80] (HELO QMTA08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.80) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:46:54 +0000 Received: from OMTA21.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.72]) by QMTA08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id UDq51c0071ZXKqc58EmaiF; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:46:34 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([69.143.128.194]) by OMTA21.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id UEpL1c0024BnRt93hEpkrP; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:49:44 +0000 Message-ID: <4A8578B1.10601@christopherschultz.net> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:46:09 -0400 From: Christopher Schultz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090715 Thunderbird/3.0b3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat writing the wrong timestamp on compiled JSP's References: <344083.28108.qm@web32808.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <934087.48719.qm@web32807.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <940379.4200.qm@web32806.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <13539.21688.qm@web32802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <997375.62913.qm@web32805.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <288231.30890.qm@web32807.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <5899FECF-AC20-40B3-BB41-A9FCB70BDE19@gmail.com> <4A8561CA.9010709@ice-sa.com> In-Reply-To: <4A8561CA.9010709@ice-sa.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 André, On 8/14/2009 9:08 AM, André Warnier wrote: > My systems are using NTP to synchronise their time, workstations too. > But I still see this discrepancy. I think Kees Jan was saying that NTP is just generally a good idea, not that it has anything to do with using WinSCP. It sounds like WinSCP is assumes that everyone uses the same DST rules and applies them blindly. No amount of date synchronization can make WinSCP less stupid :) - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkqFeLEACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDrPwCfaVqCMpO6y9wZLW4rwWcGHV8R uQsAnRDRy9F0Jbssox1KnScSD7OkxUIE =jNEh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org