Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 61719 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2009 08:20:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2009 08:20:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 9557 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 08:20:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 9477 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2009 08:20:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 9466 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2009 08:20:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:20:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [195.227.30.149] (HELO mailserver.kippdata.de) (195.227.30.149) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:19:56 +0000 Received: from [195.227.30.209] (notebook-rj [195.227.30.209]) by mailserver.kippdata.de (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id n6D8JaZp013126 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:19:36 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4A5AEDE4.4070606@kippdata.de> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:18:44 +0200 From: Rainer Jung User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Any way that scheme and/or proxyPort attributes in server.xml can add significantly to processing time? References: <602556.17843.qm@web81107.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <602556.17843.qm@web81107.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 13.07.2009 06:51, Shaun Qualheim wrote: > All -- > > Is there any way that scheme and/or proxyPort attributes in > server.xml can add significantly to processing time? We're noticing > that 2 identical servers, 1 that is straight http, and 1 that is > behind an ssl offloader with scheme=https and proxyPort=443 > attributes on the connector's element have significant lag compared > to one another on high load. What do you mean by significant? How many percent, how much in absolute terms? Does it happen for all kind of requests? Is it just an observation rom using a browser, or did you actually measure something? Activate the Tomcat access log and add "%D" (duration in milliseconds) to the pattern. Then check, whether Tomcat's idea of response time matches your observation. If not, then the additional lag might happen during processing in front of Tomcat. Regards, Rainer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org