Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 76056 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2009 09:22:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2009 09:22:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 87144 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 09:21:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 87057 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2009 09:21:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 87046 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2009 09:21:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 09:21:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.252.22.128] (HELO smtp5.freeserve.com) (193.252.22.128) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 09:21:49 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3417.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B58E01C00085 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 11:21:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.homeinbox.net (unknown [91.109.135.142]) by mwinf3417.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 927701C00081 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 11:21:28 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20090406092128600.927701C00081@mwinf3417.me.freeserve.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.homeinbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF34B1A4ADC for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:21:34 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at homeinbox.net Received: from smtp.homeinbox.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server01.dev.local [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Bj0U12Bxi0D for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:21:31 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.0.9] (study03.dev.local [192.168.0.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.homeinbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 157F81A4ADB for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:21:31 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <49D9C98B.2010900@apache.org> Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 10:21:15 +0100 From: Mark Thomas User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk log levels documentation References: <49D9C827.5090702@ice-sa.com> In-Reply-To: <49D9C827.5090702@ice-sa.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org André Warnier wrote: > Hi. > > In this page : > http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/apache.html > it says > > JkLogLevel set the log level between : > > * info log will contain standard mod_jk activity (default). > * warn log will contain non fatal error reports. > * error log will contain also error reports. > * debug log will contain all information on mod_jk activity > * trace log will contain all tracing information on mod_jk activity > > I personally find this a bit confusing, when it comes to guessing how > much detail one would get in the Jk log file. > > I also find the word "also" in the line about "error" a bit confusing. > > Also in the table higher up describing the parameters, the JkLogLevel > order is "debug, info, warn error or trace". > > Intuitively, I would imagine that by /decreasing/ level of detail, one > would have : > trace (the most verbose) > debug > info (the default) > warn > error (the least verbose) > > Is my intuition wrong ? Nope. Patches to clarify documentation are always welcome. If you need a hand to figure out how to put a patch together, just ask. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org