tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From mturra <m.tu...@kion.it>
Subject Re: Jk disable worker on status
Date Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:31:13 GMT


Rainer Jung-3 wrote:
> 
> Furthermore, disabled is a configuration state. You do not only want it 
> to be set automatically, but you also need a way of revoking it later.
> 
> I think a robust implemenation would be something like:
> 
> - a new state for temporarily disabling a node, except for sticky requests
> 
> - a configurable probe request, that the watchdog thread sends, and 
> which is answered by the application, the answer containing the 
> information whether the node should be temporarily disabled or not
> 

I agree a new state could be better. I used "disabled" because of its
behavior: let the previous run and block the new coming.
The probe is done retrying after a "quiet" period.

Thanks, Matteo.



-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Jk-disable-worker-on-status-tp22289604p22292526.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org


Mime
View raw message