Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91870 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2009 21:36:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Feb 2009 21:36:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 713 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2009 21:35:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 691 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2009 21:35:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 680 invoked by uid 99); 26 Feb 2009 21:35:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:35:56 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [64.18.2.163] (HELO exprod7og105.obsmtp.com) (64.18.2.163) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:35:47 +0000 Received: from source ([74.125.46.31]) by exprod7ob105.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKSacLHTnw3PRy/K2eYQItAlOEfbQzacpz@postini.com; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:35:26 PST Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 5so605207ywb.7 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:35:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.204.19 with SMTP id b19mr2577492ybg.214.1235684125809; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:35:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <49A46D0A.6000509@kippdata.de> <49A49360.7020604@kippdata.de> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:35:25 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Apache -> Tomcat connection problem From: Daryl Stultz To: Tomcat Users List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd2e73e5f9b610463d92146 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd2e73e5f9b610463d92146 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit It appears my last post didn't make it through some virus scanner (Antigen for Exchange found Body of Message infected with Exceeded Realtime Timeout virus.) Apologies if it made it to the list. On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > > smax Either 0 or 1. I would say 0 in order to get rid of idle > connections. > This is ignored for 2.2.2 (see https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43371). > > connectiontimeout E.g. 5 or 10 This produces an error: ProxyPass unknown Worker parameter. Unfortunately, I'm not in a position to upgrade httpd as you recommend. Should I try the worker MPM? I found this which suggests a bug has been fixed for worker MPM: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38227#c9 This is a link right to James Robinson's description of his problem which seems pretty consistent with mine. Odd, though, the original poster switched from worker to prefork as a workaround and I'm considering the opposite, so probably not the solution for me. Comments? This is starting to look more like an Apache issue, maybe I should move to that list... -- Daryl Stultz _____________________________________ 6 Degrees Software and Consulting, Inc. http://www.6degrees.com mailto:daryl@6degrees.com --000e0cd2e73e5f9b610463d92146--