Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of aw@ice-sa.com designates
 212.85.38.174 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <498E287E.3090300@ice-sa.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 01:34:06 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Warnier?= <aw@ice-sa.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Windows Domain authentication with Vista (and Tomcat)
References: <498DB585.2070208@ice-sa.com>
 <0AAE5AB84B013E45A7B61CB66943C17215B618CF97@USEA-EXCH7.na.uis.unisys.com>
 <0AAE5AB84B013E45A7B61CB66943C17215B618CF98@USEA-EXCH7.na.uis.unisys.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <0AAE5AB84B013E45A7B61CB66943C17215B618CF98@USEA-EXCH7.na.uis.unisys.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:Chuck.Caldarale@unisys.com]
>> Subject: RE: Windows Domain authentication with Vista (and Tomcat)
>>
>> Even if you're not using the NTLM HTTP filter
> 
> Are you using the current version of jCIFS?  Only 1.3 and above support NTLMv2.
> 
> You may want to post your question on the jCIFS mailing list; Mike will likely want Wireshark traces of the NTLMv2 negotiations if you do.
> 
Many thanks for the info. I had completely overlooked the latest 1.3.1 
version.  I did try the 1.3.0 and it didn't work, but I see now a 
comment to the effect that it was broken for HTTP authentication (which 
I do use). I'll go and try it again.
And I understand why Mike would want a Wireshark trace with that stuff.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org