Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 12127 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2009 18:20:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jan 2009 18:20:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 92598 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2009 18:20:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 92576 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2009 18:20:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 92565 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jan 2009 18:20:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:20:40 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of aw@ice-sa.com designates 212.85.38.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [212.85.38.174] (HELO popeye.combios.es) (212.85.38.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:20:30 +0000 Received: from [192.168.245.129] (p549EB12C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.158.177.44]) (authenticated bits=0) by popeye.combios.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n0SIK9DP018589 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:20:09 +0100 Message-ID: <4980A0DC.9070908@ice-sa.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:15:56 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Warnier?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: And how about this mod_jk.log ? References: <498094EE.7080505@ice-sa.com> <0AAE5AB84B013E45A7B61CB66943C17215B5D06284@USEA-EXCH7.na.uis.unisys.com> In-Reply-To: <0AAE5AB84B013E45A7B61CB66943C17215B5D06284@USEA-EXCH7.na.uis.unisys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/8914/Wed Jan 28 07:40:00 2009 on popeye.combios.es X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: Andr� Warnier [mailto:aw@ice-sa.com] >> Subject: And how about this mod_jk.log ? >> >> I see mod_jk messages as listed below (from mod_jk to client, and from >> mod_jk to Tomcat). > > Any chance of getting network traces for both the httpd-Tomcat and httpd-client connections? Might shed some light on what's really going on. > Well.. The flow is as follows : Request: Windows/IE6 -> Apache2.2 -> mod_jk1.2.28 -> Tomcat5.5 -> database app. Response: Windows/IE6 <- Apache2.2 <- mod_jk1.2.28 <- Tomcat5.5 <- database app. Apache, mod_jk and Tomcat run on a single Linux host. I do have remote access to the host, but only through a Citrix firewall/console where my only accesses are a putty client (SSH) and a kind of Norton Commander file explorer. I do not have remote access at all to the workstations. Whatever I could ask the customer to do at their end would have to be relatively simple. So what are my simplest options ? My plan right now would be to run a simple "HTTP-getter" program on a workstation, to see if that one confirms what IE is saying. My first candidate is "ab", which belongs to the standard Apache MSI installer too, and which I could ask to customer to install, then disable (http), then run ab in a command window, re-directing the output to a file. I have tried that locally and it seems to work. Unfortunately, on my own network I have trouble reproducing the error that the customer is seeing, everything works fine here unfortunately. So I don't know how much error information ab provides when there is actually a problem. It is not really a debugging tool, more like a tool to measure server performance. Any tip on something else, easy to install and run, which would be better suited to what I need ? >> The browser is IE6, and often returns a "This page cannot be >> displayed" ("friendly IE error message", which unfortunately >> cannot be turned off by the users, settings locked). > > It is possible to defeat the IE silliness by generating a relatively long error page (I forget what the threshold is, but it's discussed on this mailing list occasionally), although this may well be just a timeout so it wouldn't matter. > Yes, I thought of that, and 1025 bytes should be enough. But I thought of that too..: if there is never an error page sent by the server (which looks likely here, since it can't even send a normal response), then the IE error page is IE's internal one anyway. For once it is not hiding the useful server information, and being friendly in a way. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org