Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 41466 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2008 16:05:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Sep 2008 16:05:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 31067 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2008 16:04:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 31039 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2008 16:04:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 31028 invoked by uid 99); 27 Sep 2008 16:04:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 09:04:51 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.96.30.48] (HELO QMTA05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:03:48 +0000 Received: from OMTA04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.35]) by QMTA05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Kn9R1a0050lTkoCA5s4LSG; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:04:20 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.105] ([68.55.225.178]) by OMTA04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Ks4K1a00E3ra03G8Qs4LF9; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:04:20 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=TWUJlGmoATUA:10 a=Vcm8risCLhoA:10 a=xe8BsctaAAAA:8 a=n0B7EtcMr5CViWnZHw8A:9 a=1F4AEAk2O-wAfo9vQvMA:7 a=IPYcVIuma1oBjA3BYoOiPjH3oxIA:4 a=rPt6xJ-oxjAA:10 Message-ID: <48DE5980.8090602@christopherschultz.net> Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:04:16 -0400 From: Christopher Schultz User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5 war takes 4 to 7 minutes to deploy References: <1aa362cc0809270850j651a3437mfba3973f898ec161@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1aa362cc0809270850j651a3437mfba3973f898ec161@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greg, G Kontos wrote: > The application does live on a VPS - Virtuozzo VPS. My mail server runs on a VPS and it's /horrible/. I'm very unhappy. It appears to lock up all the time and cause all kinds of problems when using IMAP. I'm not sure about how Java would perform under these conditions, but I couldn't recommend that anyone use VPS for anything mission critical. I have not had first-hand experience with other virtualization products except for VMWare's workstation and player (host/guest setup) so I can't tell whether this is a problem specifically with Virtuozzo or would be a problem with any virtualized environment. > In reference to disk io - We use the same VPS at work, and the applications > deploy much faster. Outside of my anecdotal support of the VPS, I don't > know how I would get hard numbers for the disk io. Of course, at work we > use way more memory. I wonder if you're getting a much smaller slice of the disk I/O in your non-work setup. My experience is that they package the memory and CPU percentages and sell those to you, but don't generally talk about the disk I/O. Perhaps you could talk to your provider about increasing your disk I/O share (if there is such a thing). - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkjeWYAACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PA3yQCeOfXUSyP45o8I3kgESSDhTh3e r5YAnjxWvkUAGqEDjVoKRIp70CLA+gzH =fLWF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org