Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 42259 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2008 09:24:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Sep 2008 09:24:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 29625 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2008 09:24:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 29603 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2008 09:24:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 29592 invoked by uid 99); 22 Sep 2008 09:24:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 02:24:40 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [147.91.1.122] (HELO mx.rcub.bg.ac.yu) (147.91.1.122) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:23:40 +0000 Received: from [147.91.4.66] (ognjen-pc.rcub.bg.ac.yu [147.91.4.66]) by mx.rcub.bg.ac.yu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987D519192F8 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:23:34 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <48D76416.8010200@etf.bg.ac.yu> Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:23:34 +0200 From: Ognjen Blagojevic User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: HTTPS and Virtual Hosts References: <48D75DF1.8010705@ice-sa.com> In-Reply-To: <48D75DF1.8010705@ice-sa.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-RCUB-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-RCUB-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Andr� Warnier wrote: > Is the above, very roughly and approximatively still a valid explanation > of what happens, or is it totally wrong, or has something changed > in-between that I am unaware of ? Yes, that's about it. Here is the official explanation: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/ssl/ssl_faq.html#vhosts The workaround is also proposed. You can use different ports or IP adresses for different SSL enabled virtual hosts. For instance, you could put 2 or more network cards in the server, and than configure one virtual host for each of these cards. -Ognjen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org