Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 75013 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2008 17:17:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Aug 2008 17:17:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 73451 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2008 17:17:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 73428 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2008 17:17:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 73387 invoked by uid 99); 22 Aug 2008 17:17:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:17:27 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of p.gergely.sch@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.10 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.10] (HELO mail-gx0-f10.google.com) (209.85.217.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:16:27 +0000 Received: by gxk3 with SMTP id 3so1540240gxk.0 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:15:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=R/u7pE6h5jZXxwPEhRXFy/6vOiTYEojDgFV1r5faxHk=; b=sOrySVecJ4Hvt9A/TPhX+JxCr7uYDZnEyAOt50t3NRyn6gxw2VtcF6t6zyzPtUR/Qd UAmlr/e5Y2B+4HJN57v4RHj9aiLSmzA2d05W9GTnJgv1vhZb6G3VQ3aKfWey65OSWfzC oDg4Ji2tcsLvC554YP7ZIyMsWR1MSrSwGgkSY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=nUErh7DAmLc1J3LoCWBIIRzKbXuZFAc9XgDoFoJr2WPUhNR4iuMXhYVFrdLG2Ji6rC +mrQos5lsU5uBvzTDe4oW1D15wL4tcnJ9lTnjOgZbjJ6IvEg3Qa+SrNojiiqer30Cy6S bh11PX8UhzF4jqm+P/KCWIgz8b7a11eCeFi4s= Received: by 10.151.27.15 with SMTP id e15mr2204340ybj.41.1219425356153; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:15:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.40.6 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:15:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <227c419c0808221015t35c0bd86n5baa6a922f1b1538@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:15:56 +0200 From: "Gergely Paljak" To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: cluster - v5.5 or v6.x or v? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_45707_1575998.1219425356100" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_45707_1575998.1219425356100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi all, I would like to ask for your advice on a clustering issue. I intend to run a Tomcat cluster with a very old and simple application *, so the supported Servlet/JSP specs don't matter to me at all. What essential is that I want to adjust my cluster dynamically - i.e. add and remove nodes without the clients taking notice of the change. Session replication, failover, robust, reliable implementations are for me. I did read both the v5.5 and v6 manual on this issue (and other docs), and I know that the cluster support is completely rewritten in the new version. Still, I'm unsure which version to use. Any kind of advice would be most welcome! Thanks in advance, Gergely Paljak *A TPC-W implementation, this one: http://mitglied.lycos.de/jankiefer/tpcw/ ------=_Part_45707_1575998.1219425356100--