tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jonathan Mast" <jhmast.develo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: <jsp:include> versus <% include %>
Date Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:21:56 GMT
I don't think they are exactly the same.  I had something that was not
working with <jsp:include> but did for <%@ include %>.

I understand <jsp:...> this the new, XML-complaint way to do things, but
there must be subtle differences in how things are being done between these
2 approaches.

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Andrei Tchijov <andrei@tchijov.com> wrote:

> they are identical. you will want to use <jsp:include> if you care to have
> your JSP pages in form of valid XML.
>
>
> On Jun 3, 2008, at 12:52 , Jonathan Mast wrote:
>
>  I'm wondering if the <%@ include file="somefile.jsp" %> method of
>> including
>> a file is more error prone (on Tomcat) than <jsp:include
>> page="somefile.jsp"
>> flush="true"/> approach?
>>
>> Any ideas would helpful, especially an explanation of what is being done
>> under the hood when these 2 mechanisms are being invoked.
>>
>> Tomcat 5.5
>> Java 1.4.2
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message