Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 63144 invoked from network); 6 May 2008 19:15:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 May 2008 19:15:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 9636 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2008 19:15:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 9616 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2008 19:15:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 9605 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2008 19:15:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 May 2008 12:15:08 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of andremailinglist@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.251 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.251] (HELO rv-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.198.251) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 May 2008 19:14:23 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c5so1515829rvf.24 for ; Tue, 06 May 2008 12:14:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=KOfmPDMSC8z5vA3lhyv2C5MhAS2FAUA0wu5+vRzTFmo=; b=HKdMQKV+oQ7bU513qB1y16mKtI9h6Woo+mgsYVQe4hpWauhyfbo414ATfta3kP7HbJDGqukNK9JAWo4NqgwKHy+ao8Gm14kbSpBBkK8FCdtJlla9pJZ0TkA0A+z2HIm+5G6rMxhmbIZvavlfx5ytoM0o6LGLjy1ouT4VpTkv7eU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=rdW9LWqMWhSev/Cr6txHEak4S667cnqim7wLSP7y5A51c2WF0GawG/foBmhDm235hW0i1w+vhcLhaLUcvHsNzjtEHMTlwYnG9bq4xMfn2EWM0wMlPbrOATPRnzgKxxCBiMBFBTjkO1Nevou1eJVSnqB9ihVDH6E2lwCaLVov2jQ= Received: by 10.141.122.20 with SMTP id z20mr521299rvm.93.1210101277713; Tue, 06 May 2008 12:14:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.131.9 with HTTP; Tue, 6 May 2008 12:14:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <640358900805061214w33bd264djd7ee12af63f3814c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 20:14:37 +0100 From: "Andrew Hole" To: "Tomcat Users List" Subject: Web server and tomcat - firewall MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_21778_21683664.1210101277714" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_21778_21683664.1210101277714 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi all| Maybe you could help me to solve a problem with your experience. My company has implemented a solution of 3 layers (Apache web server, Tomcat Container and Database). There is a firewall between the web server and the tomcat. We get the following errors in mod_jk log: These errors are caused by loss of TCP packages in firewall (???). [Tue May 06 16:24:03 2008] [2704:3128] [error] jk_ajp_common.c (951): (p11) can't receive the response message from tomcat, network problems or tomcat ( 10.202.131.130:8009) is down (errno=54) [Tue May 06 16:24:03 2008] [2704:3128] [error] jk_ajp_common.c (1592): (p11) Tomcat is down or refused connection. No response has been sent to the client (yet) (is not true when log says that tomcat is down because some requests get the correct response) Setting "JkOptions + DisableReuse" in httpd.conf does not solve the problem. Any suggestions? Thank you and I apologise for the inconvenience. Greetings ------=_Part_21778_21683664.1210101277714--