Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 10835 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2008 08:21:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Apr 2008 08:21:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 69247 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2008 08:21:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 69226 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2008 08:21:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 69211 invoked by uid 99); 4 Apr 2008 08:21:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:21:36 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.97.136.139] (HELO n066.sc1.he.tucows.com) (64.97.136.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 08:20:44 +0000 Received: from sc1-out09.emaildefenseservice.com (64.97.139.2) by n066.sc1.he.tucows.com (7.2.069.1) id 4769F91800CD9C98 for users@tomcat.apache.org; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 08:21:03 +0000 X-SpamScore: 2 X-Spamcatcher-Summary: 2,0,0,1ee406248cc7f693,7ffdaf1c53d9c7c1,markt@apache.org,-,RULES_HIT:355:379:599:601:854:988:989:1187:1260:1261:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1358:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1539:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1766:1792:2379:2393:2559:2562:3027:3352:3865:3866:3867:3868:3869:3870:3871:3872:3874:4250:4470:5007:6119:7652:7903,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fu,MSBL:none,DNSBL:none X-Spamcatcher-Explanation: Received: from [10.49.223.125] (unknown [212.183.136.193]) (Authenticated sender: med.thomas) by sc1-out09.emaildefenseservice.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 08:21:02 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <47F5E4EA.7040903@apache.org> Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 09:20:58 +0100 From: Mark Thomas User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: How can applications be isolated in Tomcat? References: <012401c89604$4ac15940$6701a8c0@SONYVGNSZ220P> In-Reply-To: <012401c89604$4ac15940$6701a8c0@SONYVGNSZ220P> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Pablo Lopez wrote: > It appears this could be done through virtual hosting and appbase settings > but this is way beyond my knowledge and I�m just architecting the solution. > I know we'll have to get a Tomcat expert in at some point in the future but > just wondered if I'm going down the right or wrong road here. The danger with this approach is that all instances share a JVM so there is scope for interference. > Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated and apologies if I got all > of the terminology wrong. I'd use multiple Tomcat instances. There is still scope for resource conflicts at the machine level but there is far less chance of conflict. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org