Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36318 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2008 12:32:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2008 12:32:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 63250 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2008 12:32:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 62267 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2008 12:32:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 62256 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2008 12:32:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Apr 2008 05:32:34 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.61.61.104] (HELO usea-naimss2.unisys.com) (192.61.61.104) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:31:50 +0000 Received: from usea-nagw2.na.uis.unisys.com ([129.224.72.18]) by usea-naimss2 with InterScan Message Security Suite; Thu, 03 Apr 2008 07:29:02 -0500 Received: from usea-nagw2.na.uis.unisys.com ([129.224.72.53]) by usea-nagw2.na.uis.unisys.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 3 Apr 2008 07:29:01 -0500 Received: from USEA-EXCH2.na.uis.unisys.com ([129.224.72.37]) by usea-nagw2.na.uis.unisys.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 3 Apr 2008 07:29:01 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5 and keep-alive and http connector Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 07:28:26 -0500 Message-ID: <2828B04F0113CD468E6D1D51DF4362A4058DFE58@USEA-EXCH2.na.uis.unisys.com> In-Reply-To: <495742D1-0566-4F03-9FDA-A5DC9214E6F5@2sheds.de> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Tomcat 5.5 and keep-alive and http connector Thread-Index: AciVhWGlhAVhidfHSnKqyN9k9FMJSgAAEvrA References: <0724B966-064C-42FE-8EFB-CB8A79A6E83F@2sheds.de> <2828B04F0113CD468E6D1D51DF4362A4058AFCB8@USEA-EXCH2.na.uis.unisys.com> <7826CDA8-B5D1-4E3A-A262-163EA2089F04@2sheds.de> <495742D1-0566-4F03-9FDA-A5DC9214E6F5@2sheds.de> From: "Caldarale, Charles R" To: "Tomcat Users List" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Apr 2008 12:29:01.0864 (UTC) FILETIME=[4C51BA80:01C89586] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > From: Andrew Miehs [mailto:andrew@2sheds.de]=20 > Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5 and keep-alive and http connector >=20 > Does tomcat > a) Assign a connection to a single thread and only use this=20 > thread for the connection until the connection is closed? > or > b) Assign a request to a thread, and return the thread back=20 > to a controlling thread on completion of the request? >=20 > My understanding is that the answer is 'A' except for the=20 > case of NIO and Tomcat 6. I believe you are correct, but I'd like to hear from Filip H to make sure. > BTW: The last thing I heard is that APR is still recommended=20 > for performance and stability over TC 6 NIO - or do you have=20 > any newer info? I think the only significant performance difference is with SSL - the OpenSSL package is noticeably faster than JCE. I'm not aware of any stability issues with either. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org