tomcat-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David kerber <dcker...@verizon.net>
Subject Re: Tomcat tuning
Date Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:12:44 GMT
Charlie Wingate wrote:
> That makes complete sense to me Charles, and pretty much exactly what
> lead me to those settings; I could not agree more.  Performance
> testing/tuning is entirely dependant upon what you are trying to do and
> identification of the "weakest/most unstable" link, even if it does end
> up being your own code.  :)
>   
Which it usually is, at least in my case <GGG>.

D

> Charlie Wingate
> cwingate@valco-data.com
>  
> The significant problems we have cannot be solved at the same level of
> thinking with which we created them. ~ Albert Einstein
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:Chuck.Caldarale@unisys.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 11:44 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Tomcat tuning
>
>   
>> From: Charlie Wingate [mailto:cwingate@valco-data.com] 
>> Subject: RE: Tomcat tuning
>>
>> I do not know of any documents that directly speak to 
>> performance tuning
>>     
>
> The reason for that is performance tuning depends almost entirely on the
> applications being run, not on the container itself.  You discovered
> that you needed more threads and heap for your load testing; but
> increasing those in a different environment may well reduce performance.
> You have to monitor and measure your own workload, determine the
> bottlenecks specific to your situation, and address them.
>
>  - Chuck
>   



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org


Mime
View raw message