Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3315 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2008 19:30:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jan 2008 19:30:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 18934 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2008 19:30:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 18910 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2008 19:30:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 18899 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jan 2008 19:30:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:30:24 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jcleiva@cbnco.com designates 207.164.182.72 as permitted sender) Received: from [207.164.182.72] (HELO smtp.cbnco.com) (207.164.182.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:30:10 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cbnco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D8A233E03 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:30:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp.cbnco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cbnco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02290-04 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:30:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from [172.20.21.253] (auriga-dmzgw.cbnco.com [207.164.182.65]) by smtp.cbnco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3924B2337BB for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:30:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <47A0D03F.4080701@cbnco.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:30:07 -0500 From: Julio Cesar Leiva Reply-To: jcleiva@cbnco.com Organization: CBN User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Xmx and Xms size References: <47A0875C.6080108@cbnco.com> <20080130143641.GA18131@IUPUI.Edu> In-Reply-To: <20080130143641.GA18131@IUPUI.Edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cbnco.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks all of you for your tips. They have gave us a lot of indication how to tackle this.. Great.,,, Mark H. Wood wrote: >What kind of processors specifically? In a 32-bit address space, >there's no point in giving Tomcat more than 2GB, because the JVM won't >use it. If you have 64-bit userspace and a JVM built for it then you >can use more, but remember to leave a bit for OS caches, other >processes, etc. (Starve the block cache and your disk I/O throughput >will suffer.) > >>From somewhere I recall a rule of thumb: if the box's primary duty is >to run a single Java app., give that app. up to 75% of physical >memory. But that's a rule of thumb, and could be made nonsense by >unusual hardware or an unusual app. Any answer you get here should be >taken as initial conditions for a tuning exercise: start there, >measure performance and resource utilization, theorize, adjust, repeat >until you get the performance you need or are convinced that you can't >without changing something else (application design, bigger/faster >hardware, network optimization, whatever). > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org