Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 86032 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2007 21:20:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Nov 2007 21:20:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 71151 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2007 21:20:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 71132 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2007 21:20:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 71121 invoked by uid 99); 14 Nov 2007 21:20:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:20:11 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.202.165.39] (HELO smtpauth14.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.39) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:20:01 +0000 Received: (qmail 30263 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2007 21:19:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (64.202.165.39) by smtpauth14.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.39) with ESMTP; 14 Nov 2007 21:19:50 -0000 Message-ID: <473B666B.8050403@stanczakgroup.com> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:19:39 -0500 From: Stanczak Group User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070802) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Best Linux distribution References: <640358900711140948i1750abf8u376182ebcd63c270@mail.gmail.com> <473B3870.4020103@christopherschultz.net> <20071114210429.GB351@IUPUI.Edu> In-Reply-To: <20071114210429.GB351@IUPUI.Edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Mark H. Wood wrote: > Yes, before anyone can tell you which is best, you need to work out > for yourself, and tell us, what makes a distro "best". Do you want to > just pour it into a machine and have everything done for you? Yes > Do you > chafe at the very notion that someone could know your needs better > than you? No > Do you need someone to talk to when things go wrong? Yes > to sue > when the answers don't satisfy? For sure, that's a yes. > Do you have uncommon hardware to > support? Only on Saturday. > Will your hardware vendor return your calls if you don't use > his preferred distro? No > do you care? > Yes > I've run Red Hat, Debian, Suse, and Gentoo, and I'll take Gentoo any > day, but I'm a very hands-on, tweak-the-last-cycle-out, > do-it-with-a-text-editor-or-don't-do-it sort of sysadmin. There are > good reasons to choose any of those, or others, and you have to decide > which reasons are yours. > A Conary based distro is always best. All others a second. :) -- Justin Stanczak Stanczak Group 812-735-3600 "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org