Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 51422 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2007 20:38:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Oct 2007 20:38:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 2494 invoked by uid 500); 31 Oct 2007 20:37:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 2474 invoked by uid 500); 31 Oct 2007 20:37:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 2454 invoked by uid 99); 31 Oct 2007 20:37:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:37:58 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [81.16.53.101] (HELO pm1.terions.de) (81.16.53.101) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:38:16 +0000 Received: (qmail 22077 invoked by uid 98); 31 Oct 2007 20:36:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.123.102?) (mailing-lists@dueppe.com@82.207.246.165) by 0 with ESMTPA; 31 Oct 2007 20:36:19 -0000 Message-ID: <4728E793.3070803@dueppe.com> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:37:39 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Ingo_D=FCppe?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Unrecoverable error 200, request failed References: <4724673D.6010301@dueppe.com> <47247F31.3030105@kippdata.de> <47248851.6020308@dueppe.com> <4724960F.5040103@kippdata.de> In-Reply-To: <4724960F.5040103@kippdata.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Rainer, now I got it what you mean about the steady state. Thx Ingo Rainer Jung schrieb: > Hi Ingo, > > Ingo D�ppe wrote: >> Am I'm right, that with the following setting a reply_timeout is >> detected when the tomcat doesn't reply within 10 seconds and it will >> be set into error if more than 15 timeouts in a minutes are detected? >> >> worker.plexus.reply_timeout=10000 > > Yes. The timeout gets reset every time mod_jk waits for the next > package. So it's not an overall response time timeout, but it limits > the longest pause allowed between reposnse packets. Usually it will > fire, between the point in time the request was forwarded to Tomcat > and the first request packet arrives. Most apps don't have huge delays > after that point. > > See also > > http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/generic_howto/timeouts.html > > for a description of all possible timeouts. > >> worker.plexus.max_reply_timeouts=30 > > In case you assume a steady rate of long running requests, yes: 15 per > minute. In case there were no long running requests for a long time, > our intrnal counter will be zero and we will allo up to 30 long > running requests before triggering the error status. > > The counter gets divided by 2 every minute, so that older events count > less the longer they are away. A worker that worked fast for a long > time can use all of the 30 events, if it already had 30 (or 29) > timeouts in the minute before, only 15 are free the next minute. > > Regards, > > Rainer > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org