Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 44793 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2007 17:03:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Sep 2007 17:03:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 59394 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2007 17:02:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-tomcat-users-archive@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 59369 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2007 17:02:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@tomcat.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list users@tomcat.apache.org Received: (qmail 59358 invoked by uid 99); 6 Sep 2007 17:02:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:02:55 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.61.61.104] (HELO usea-naimss2.unisys.com) (192.61.61.104) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:04:10 +0000 Received: from usea-nagw3.na.uis.unisys.com ([129.224.72.20]) by usea-naimss2 with InterScan Message Security Suite; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:02:28 -0500 Received: from usea-nagw3.na.uis.unisys.com ([129.224.72.55]) by usea-nagw3.na.uis.unisys.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 6 Sep 2007 12:02:27 -0500 Received: from USRV-EXCH4.na.uis.unisys.com ([192.61.245.233]) by usea-nagw3.na.uis.unisys.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 6 Sep 2007 12:02:27 -0500 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: RE: Tomcat Farm Deployment and Statistics Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 12:02:23 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <12526752.post@talk.nabble.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Tomcat Farm Deployment and Statistics Thread-Index: Acfwpn3ZgtlJFmk5SiOnUNBXFjoD3AAAG7Ww References: <12521532.post@talk.nabble.com> <12526752.post@talk.nabble.com> From: "Caldarale, Charles R" To: "Tomcat Users List" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Sep 2007 17:02:27.0717 (UTC) FILETIME=[B438BB50:01C7F0A7] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > From: bajistaman [mailto:bajistaman@gmail.com]=20 > Subject: RE: Tomcat Farm Deployment and Statistics >=20 > I was reading about JMX and Tomcat and I wonder if is it > better (more secure?) to do it at the low level as you=20 > suggested or by using the JMX API? I think using JMX would make it more complicated and may well decrease security since there would be yet another port open into Tomcat; others may have differing opinions. However, your reference to JMX did remind me of Lambda Probe (www.lambdaprobe.org), which is a very useful Tomcat monitoring tool. I've never tried it in a Tomcat clustering environment, but it does appear to have some support for that. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org